Philosophy Of The Human Person Essay Sample free essay sample

The last faculty discussed the gradual separation between mythology and doctrine in the Grecian civilization. Mythology had a great influence over the development of doctrine. It provided constructs. images and narrations that were appropriated. criticized or flatly rejected by doctrine. While there may be a â€Å"break† between mythology and doctrine. doctrine still relied on the fabulous inclination to narrate in a poetic manner – that is. in in writing and ocular footings that were easy understood. Furthermore. the early philosophers still had to turn to the myths in order to foster their ain constructs about the universe and humanity. But the inquiry is why are we concentrating ourselves in Greek doctrine? Are at that place no other doctrines in the universe contemporary to the clip of the early Greeks? I. Doctrine – Where Did It Come From? To state that doctrine originated downright from the Greeks is a error. The mere fact that every civilisation in the whole universe has its ain set of fabulous narrations implies that there is a possibility for every civilisation to develop its ain set of doctrine. We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy Of The Human Person Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Another thing. it is besides a fact that there are other booming doctrines in other parts of the universe that precede. about coincident to or contemporary with Grecian doctrine. We can name Buddhist. Hindu and Confucian doctrines as illustrations. There are besides surveies that say Grecian doctrine is influenced by or derived functions of the mystical humanistic disciplines of Egypt and other Near East civilizations and faiths. Whatever the instance. there is no unequivocal reply as to the beginning of doctrine itself. There is far excessively much correlativity among civilizations. civilisations. faiths and myths to merely nail the exact location of the beginning of doctrine itself. It is hence non a inquiry of where. Rather. we must inquire: what is particular among the Greeks that we readily tie in doctrine with them? The influence of Greek doctrine is undeniable. From the clip of its origin in the sixth century BCE until the Hellenistic times. its incorporation into the Roman universe until today. there can be no equivalent to the monolithic part of Grecian doctrine to about every organic structure of cognition we have. Much of Western idea may be credited to Greek doctrine. so much so that Alfred Whitehead. a philosopher himself. says that â€Å"European philosophical tradition is a series of footers to Plato. † While we may state that Grecian doctrine itself is a merchandise of both Western and Eastern myths. faith. divinity and cosmology. we have to acknowledge that doctrine as we understand it now. is a Grecian creative activity. It seems that the Greeks taught themselves how to ground. II. What Made the Greeks Different? A cautiousness must be made when stating â€Å"Greek† in depicting doctrine. While it is true that the trade name of doctrine being discussed here is â€Å"Greek† . non every Grecian culture/society can be credited with the development of doctrine. Example: the Spartans were Greeks but they neer had any strain of philosophical motion. The Athenians and Milesians were Greeks and they contributed to philosophy. The Ionians were Grecian people but they were non from Greece itself – they are from contemporary Turkey. What is being referred to here. hence. are the peculiar Greeks who have a manus in the development of doctrine itself. So. what was different among these peculiar Greeks that doctrine flourished among them? First. those metropoliss where doctrine bloomed were metropoliss with wealth. In the ancient times. most affluent civilisations were affluent due to their agricultural advantages. Examples in this instance are Egypt. Babylon and Mesopotamia. However. Grecian metropoliss like Athens and Miletus are non agricultural lands. Therefore. the wealth of these metropoliss can merely be explained by another beginning – that is trade. But the economic status of the metropoliss entirely can non explicate how and why doctrine flourishes in that certain metropolis. In the first topographic point. Egypt and Babylon are far richer than the Grecian metropoliss but they have non seen a growing in doctrine. This can be explained by the civilization that an agricultural society Fosters compared to that of a society that relies on trade. Agricultural civilisations normally become autocratic societies that value conformance above others. Independence of head and creativeness of ideas are non tolera ted. This is extremely seen in Egyptian society – the absolute regulation lies on the Pharaoh and those who are non in the Pharaoh’s societal category are provincials or slaves coerced or seized for labour and revenue enhancements. On the other manus. a metropolis that relies on trade Fosters considerable independency – being far off from place and authorization. covering with fresh thoughts. patterns. civilizations and peoples. Discovery. wonder and the independency to treat the changing thoughts from different civilizations allow so for a originative ambiance that encourages philosophical thought. Yet once more. a trading metropolis entirely can non explicate why doctrine can turn in a certain topographic point. There is a much more ancient metropolis engaging in trade than Athens – that is Phoenicia. but doctrine has neer taken root among them. However. the Greeks learned something from the Phoenicians – the 2nd ground being the phonic alphabet adapted by the Greeks from the Phoenicians during their trading yearss. Unlike that of the Egyptian hieroglyphs. the Phoenician alphabet was more flexible in its application since it did non necessitate excessively many images to show a idea. Not merely that. since the hieroglyphs were besides more ritualistic and spiritual in application. it was entirely for those intents merely that it was used. unlike the Phoenician alphabet. Ideas recorded through the phonic alphabet therefore had more opportunities of being understood. spread. interpreted and preserved for other coevalss. But non merely that. the Phoenicians have bes ides founded settlements all over the Mediterranean throughout their history so that some Grecian philosophers really have Phoenician lineage. The first philosopher. Thales. is said to hold Phoenician lineage though he resides in a Grecian metropolis. Again. accommodating a phonic alphabet entirely can non explicate why doctrine can develop. There is a alone event in the history of Greece – that is the 3rd ground: the loss of the establishment of kingship. This has neer happened before in any of the other civilisations. When ancient male monarchs are overthrown. they are merely replaced by other male monarchs. Particularly in Greece. male monarchs have been replaced by the office of the archon ( ruler/regent ) who is elected to the office with life term of office at first by virtuousness of his baronial birth. But subsequently on. the office of trustee was opened by a adult male named Solon to an one-year term of office by virtuousness of a man’s wealth. instead than baronial birth. After a few battles with some autocrats. a adult male named Cleisthenes ushered an basically pure democracy. The creative activity of wealth by trade therefore eroded the traditional authorization and kingship of Grecian swayers. This has given manner to a new category in society who chafed at familial privileges and has the agencies to marshal forces against the same governments. How can a category like this emerge? That is through the development of coined money. the 4th ground. Coinage was invented in Lydia. The Lydians were non Greeks but they worked closely with them. giving rise to wealthy metropoliss such as Miletus. one of the ancient hotbeds of doctrine. Coinage enhanced societal mobility but besides facilitated political struggles that farther degraded the traditional powers of male monarchs among Grecian metropoliss. The 5th ground why doctrine took root among the Greeks is the subject of the two old faculties: the separation between mythology and rational chases. Grecian mythologies are non merely narratives – they are a critical portion of their faith. But of all time since Thales and the other philosophers started to sabotage the credibleness of myths. Grecian faith grew steadily apart from doctrine. III. Why Grecian Doctrine – A Decision Although it can be pointed out that the causal connexion between doctrine and the above-named grounds is non direct. the correlativity between doctrine and metropoliss that have undergone dramatic alterations in their commercialism and political relations is obvious. Ionia is one of the wealthiest and most active metropoliss in Greece – and it is where doctrine has started. From Ionia ( where Thales. Anaximander. Anaximenes. Heraclitus and Xenophanes come from ) . it spread to Italy ( Pythagoras. Parmenides. Zeno ) . Sicily ( Empedocles ) . northern Aegean ( Democritus. Protagoras ) . to Ionia once more ( Melissos ) and Athens ( Socrates. Plato. Aristotle ) . The commercial democracy that developed in Greece. particularly in Athens. provided the societal and rational context where doctrine can turn. Indeed. even now. whenever we think of doctrine. we think of Greece ; and whenever we think of Greece. we think of Athens. Such is the influence of Athens in doctrine ( due to Socr ates. Plato and Aristotle ) ; and such is the influence of the Greeks in doctrine. Questions: Answers to the inquiries must be placed on a whole sheet of paper. 1. Research the economic. political and cultural state of affairs of Sparta and explicate. establishing from the above-named grounds. why doctrine did non boom at that place. ( 20 points ) 2. If doctrine by chance flourished in the Philippines in the ancient times. what do you believe is the cardinal theme/content of our doctrine? Explain. ( 20 points )

Free Essays on Weep Not, Child

During the end of the nineteenth century the British government was planning, with Germany, on the partitioning of African territories so as to create holding on the continent and become part of the growing importance of this area to global trade and expansion. In the section of Africa that would become the British East Africa Protectorate and then Kenya in 1920, there was a wide range of cultural groups that lived by farming and herding livestock. There were also some groups, like the Kikuyu who were nomadic herders that lived in the mountainous, who were the least interested in colonization or cooperating with those types of governments. When the British decided to begin using the coastal areas of Kenya to trade in the Indian Ocean, they had a hard time extending their control inland. The cultural groups in the interior of the colony were not ready to give up their control and the British would have to take military action before the colony would be completely under their contr ol. The British began to classify the ethnic groups in the colony and force them to live in different area in order to divide and conquer the ethnic groups. Some of the ethnic groups, those who were wealthy and powerful, started to work with the British to establish a British government to run the colony of Kenya. Those poorer groups in the southern and western parts of Kenya, as well as in the mountain regions, were more resistant to change. The book Weep Not, Child takes place during the same time period telling the story about one families, the Ngotho families experience during the time Britain took over in Africa. The British helped the colonization by increasing the taxes levied on the Africans, in effect forcing them to work the white settler’s farm to pay the taxes, or retreat from the area. Either way the British were gaining more and more land to call Kenya. After World War II the British government had to deal with the tribal groups in Ken... Free Essays on Weep Not, Child Free Essays on Weep Not, Child During the end of the nineteenth century the British government was planning, with Germany, on the partitioning of African territories so as to create holding on the continent and become part of the growing importance of this area to global trade and expansion. In the section of Africa that would become the British East Africa Protectorate and then Kenya in 1920, there was a wide range of cultural groups that lived by farming and herding livestock. There were also some groups, like the Kikuyu who were nomadic herders that lived in the mountainous, who were the least interested in colonization or cooperating with those types of governments. When the British decided to begin using the coastal areas of Kenya to trade in the Indian Ocean, they had a hard time extending their control inland. The cultural groups in the interior of the colony were not ready to give up their control and the British would have to take military action before the colony would be completely under their contr ol. The British began to classify the ethnic groups in the colony and force them to live in different area in order to divide and conquer the ethnic groups. Some of the ethnic groups, those who were wealthy and powerful, started to work with the British to establish a British government to run the colony of Kenya. Those poorer groups in the southern and western parts of Kenya, as well as in the mountain regions, were more resistant to change. The book Weep Not, Child takes place during the same time period telling the story about one families, the Ngotho families experience during the time Britain took over in Africa. The British helped the colonization by increasing the taxes levied on the Africans, in effect forcing them to work the white settler’s farm to pay the taxes, or retreat from the area. Either way the British were gaining more and more land to call Kenya. After World War II the British government had to deal with the tribal groups in Ken...

Caperucita Roja‘Little Red Riding Hood’ in Spanish

Caperucita Roja‘Little Red Riding Hood’ in Spanish Here is a public-domain version of Caperucita Roja, a Spanish version of the fairy tale known in the English-speaking world Little Red Riding Hood. Grammar and vocabulary notes follow for the aid of Spanish students. Caperucita Roja Habà ­a una vez una nià ±a muy bonita. Su madre le habà ­a hecho una capa roja y la muchachita la llevaba tan a menudo que todo el mundo la llamaba Caperucita Roja. Un dà ­a, su madre le pidià ³ que llevase unos pasteles a su abuela que vivà ­a al otro lado del bosque, recomendndole que no se entretuviese por el camino, pues cruzar el bosque era muy peligroso, ya que siempre andaba acechando por allà ­ el lobo. Caperucita Roja recogià ³ la cesta con los pasteles y se puso en camino. La nià ±a tenà ­a que atravesar el bosque para llegar a casa de la abuelita, pero no le daba miedo porque allà ­ siempre se encontraba con muchos amigos: los pjaros, las ardillas listadas, los ciervos. De repente vio al lobo, que era enorme, delante de ella. -  ¿Adà ³nde vas, nià ±a bonita? - le preguntà ³ el lobo con su voz ronca. - A casa de mi abuelita - le dijo Caperucita. - No est lejos - pensà ³ el lobo para sà ­, dndose media vuelta. Caperucita puso su cesta en la hierba y se entretuvo cogiendo flores: - El lobo se ha ido - pensà ³ - no tengo nada que temer. La abuela se pondr muy contenta cuando le lleve un hermoso ramo de flores adems de los pasteles. Mientras tanto, el lobo se fue a casa de la abuelita, llamà ³ suavemente a la puerta y la anciana le abrià ³ pensando que era Caperucita. Un cazador que pasaba por allà ­ habà ­a observado la llegada del lobo. El lobo devorà ³ a la abuelita y se puso el gorro rosa de la desdichada, se metià ³ en la cama y cerrà ³ los ojos. No tuvo que esperar mucho, pues Caperucita Roja llegà ³ enseguida, toda contenta. La nià ±a se acercà ³ a la cama y vio que su abuela estaba muy cambiada. - Abuelita, abuelita,  ¡quà © ojos ms grandes tienes! - Son para verte mejor- dijo el lobo tratando de imitar la voz de la abuela. - Abuelita, abuelita,  ¡quà © orejas ms grandes tienes! - Son para oà ­rte mejor - siguià ³ diciendo el lobo. - Abuelita, abuelita,  ¡quà © dientes ms grandes tienes! - Son para...  ¡comerte mejor! - y diciendo esto, el lobo malvado se abalanzà ³ sobre la nià ±ita y la devorà ³, lo mismo que habà ­a hecho con la abuelita. Mientras tanto, el cazador se habà ­a quedado preocupado y creyendo adivinar las malas intenciones del lobo, decidià ³ echar un vistazo a ver si todo iba bien en la casa de la abuelita. Pidià ³ ayuda a un segador y los dos juntos llegaron al lugar. Vieron la puerta de la casa abierta y al lobo tumbado en la cama, dormido de tan harto que estaba. El cazador sacà ³ su cuchillo y rajà ³ el vientre del lobo. La abuelita y Caperucita estaban allà ­,  ¡vivas! Para castigar al lobo malo, el cazador le llenà ³ el vientre de piedras y luego lo volvià ³ a cerrar. Cuando el lobo despertà ³ de su pesado sueà ±o, sintià ³ muchà ­sima sed y se dirigià ³ a una charca prà ³xima para beber. Como las piedras pesaban mucho, cayà ³ en la charca de cabeza y se ahogà ³. En cuanto a Caperucita y su abuela, no sufrieron ms que un gran susto, pero Caperucita Roja habà ­a aprendido la leccià ³n. Prometià ³ a su abuelita no hablar con ningà ºn desconocido que se encontrara en el camino. De ahora en adelante, seguir las juiciosas recomendaciones de su abuelita y de su mam. Grammar Notes Habà ­a una vez is a common way of saying once upon a time. Its literal meaning is there was a time. Habà ­a is the imperfect tense of the very common hay, which means there is or there are. Muchachita is a diminutive form of muchacha, a word for girl. The diminutive is formed here using the suffix -ita. The diminutive form can indicate that the girl is small or can be used to indicate affection. Abuelita, a form of abuela or grandmother, is another diminutive found in this story. In that case, it is probably being used as a term of affection rather than referring to her size. The name of the story itself is another diminiutive; a caperuza is a hood. The dashes beginning in the fifth paragraph function as type of quotation mark. Words such as verte, oà ­rte, and comerte wont be found in dictionaries, because they are infinitives joined with the object pronoun te. Such pronouns can either be attached to infinitives or be placed before them. Such pronouns can also be attached to gerunds, as in dndose. The opposite of a diminutive is an augmentative, and an example here is muchà ­simo, derived from mucho. Vocabulary Definitions in this list are not complete; they are designed to give primarily the meanings of these words as they are used in the story. abalanzarse sobre- to fall on top ofabuela- grandmotheracechar- to stalkahogar- to drownde ahora en adelante- from now onanciano- old personardilla listada- chipmunkatravesar- to go acrossbosque- forestde cabeza- head firstcambiar- to change capa- cape castigar- to punishcazador- huntercesta- basketcharca- pondciervo- deercuchillo- knifeen cuanto a- with regard todar media vuelta- to turn halfway arounddesdichado- unfortunatedespertar- to wake updevorar- to devourdirigirse a- to head towardechar un vistazo- to check things outenseguida- very soonentretener- to get sidetrackedgorro- bonnetharto- full of foodjuicioso- sensiblejunto- togetherllenar- to filllobo- wolfmalvado- wickeda menudo- frequentlymeterse- to entermientras tanto- meanwhileoreja- earpesar- to have weightpiedra- rockprometer- to promiseprà ³ximo- nearbyrajar- to slice openramo- bouquetde repente- at onceronco- hoarsesacar- to take outsed- thirstsegador- harvesterseguir- to follow, to continuesuave- softsusto- frighttratar de- to try totumbado- lying downvientre - belly

Art Management-festival comparison Literature review

Art Management-festival comparison - Literature review Example Additionally the works of the extremely powerful artists of those eras, like Gyula Kaesz and Lajos Kozma, the show displays the furniture of such, all but forgotten presently, which was once very admired, designers as Gyà ¶rgy Frà ¤nkel, Zsuzsa Kovà ¡cs, Pà ¡l Và ¡gà ³, Gyà ¶rgy Kà ³rà ³dy and Kà ¡roly Nagy, as well as those equipments that make a living space a residence, like textiles, lighting fittings and ornaments. Music Festivals are specially organized events oriented towards the culture of not only domestic people, but also for international visitors. It is also focused towards the leisure time of both the general and business to business customers. Music Festivals are known as culturally oriented tourism (Koutoulas, N.d.). Although cultural tourism shows a little favoritism towards the â€Å"elite† culture and associated people, much of the contemporary culture revolves around â€Å"folk† culture (Walle, 1998). A cultural tourism event attracts not only large diversified customers, but it also attracts potentially lucrative sponsors and in turn, the sponsors can also communicate to a large number of target audiences (Walle, 1998). Music festivals can be understood as a result derived from the increasing demand of culture along with increased availability of time for leisure and holidays (Frey, 1994). It was observed that number of foreign visitors in Finland was increased in the year of 1980-1990. It is from that time, Kuhmo Chamber Music Festival, based in Finland, went into the pre-internationalization process. After 1990s, it is observed that after the sudden increase in the year 1990s following by the deep recession, consumers’ willingness to join music festivals had also been changed (Tikkanen, 2008, pp.127-133). From the year of establishment in the year 1970 to 1975, it was known as â€Å"Local Chamber Music Festival†. At that time, due to scarce financial and labor resources, voluntary

New buses for corfu Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

New buses for corfu - Assignment Example In consideration to providing the cost saving approach in the business, business is planning to acquire the new services that would meet with the needs of services. Moreover, during the initial time of agreement Trivia appears to provide it services all across the island. In this consideration, later Trivia bus agency introduces accumulated buses service in order to meet the additional requirement of passengers. However, after six month of operation of Trivia buses in island, business recognizes to make some considerable changes in the route of buses in order to provide access more destinations. Moreover, with the implementation of this approach there was considerable dilemma in inhabitants, as they now have to travel with three different buses to reach their destination. Correspondingly, prior to the agreement of Corfu Transport Authority with Trivia the old public transportation system is very much friendly to the passages. However, with the introduction of Trivia, the drivers were employed to drive buses at those location based on the passengers reports. However, the drivers were provided with inferior wage system in comparison to Corfu Transport Authority. This resulted to lack of affection in the mind of the passengers to avail the services of Trivia and over the period of three years the rate of passengers has been diminished to two third whereby increasing the rate of private transportation. In this regard, the paper intends to highlight the account of failure to provide appropriate services by Trivia Buses in the island of Corfu. Besides, the paper also emphasizes over providing the method through which Corfu Transport Authority can command the transportation system. Additionally, the paper will reflect the benefits of integrated marketing approach to attract larger sections of Corfu’s islanders and tourists to avail the public transpiration system. Transportation is one of the fundamental as well as integral

How does the novel Of Mice And Men reflect life in the 1930s Essay Example for Free

How does the novel Of Mice And Men reflect life in the 1930s Essay Question-How does the novel Of Mice And Men reflect life in the 1930s John Steinbeck was born in 1902 in Salinas, California. His mother was a teacher and the reason why he learned to love books and his father was a county treasurer. He attended his local school and in the holidays worked on farms and ranches, this is the reason he is able to give such an insight to how life was there. After school he went to Stanford university studying marine biology but did not get a degree. He then went to New York for a short time were he worked as a reporter for the American Newspaper, before going back to California to concentrate on is writing. He wrote many books including Sea of Cortez, Of Mice An Men and A Russian Journal Before winning a noble Prize for Literature in 1962. The novel I am doing this essay on I Of Mice And Men by John Steinbeck, set in California. The book was written In 1936 and also based in this period. This is in the middle of the great depression, which started in 1930 when firms and 2298 banks went bust and losing everybodies savings and finished at the beginning of the second world war. During the depression millions of people were left wandering around looking for jobs and surviving any way they could. All this came just after the boom of the 1920s where it was easy to find work and everybody was paid very well. In the 30s Steinbeck was also one of the 13million people without a proper job, this is because his writing alone would not be able to support him. This is similar to page 11 in the book where Lennie and George are looking for jobs, they also didnt have much money so they are unable so buy the simplest things such as ketchup for their baked beans. Steinbeck found a job and found out how hard the work is on a ranch, he uses is experiences on Lennie and George as they also found a job a ranch in California and had to work very hard, just to get there $50s a month. The reason why Lennie and George kept working is because of their dream. The Dream was to own a small farm in the country side with animals and crops, they have this dream because it is the only thing they have to look forward to in life, and as they as they money to achieve the dream it gives them a reason to work. Because of the depression all the other plans have been ruined as there is not even enough money to buy food, they need a dream to keep them going. George and Lennie are the main characters in the story, Lennie is a very big strong man but when he was young he kicked in the head by a horse. This caused him brain damage and he now is unable to make his own decisions and generally acts like a small child, this story was one told by George so people didnt think Lennie was born this way. He is described by George as a big dumb bastard who is no good for himself. Even though George says this sometimes he is still always there for him. He had been looking after Lennie nearly all his life and always tries to help him. George is the person who keeps control of what they do. He takes control of everything from getting them both jobs to what they eat. He even speaks for Lennie, like when they arrive at the ranch they have to go and speak to the owner, before they go in George even tells Lennie not to speak, and any questions that Lennie does get asked George answers for him. Crooks is the only black man working on the ranch. He is treated with the least respect and is made to sleep on his own in a little shed next to a dung pile. He knows where he stands, which is at the bottom. He is shown no respect except for his job as he is very good at it and when he is playing horse shoe as he is also very good at that. At the time the book was written in the 1930s in the height of the Klu Klux Klan (kkk) who wanted total segregation and destruction of other races. They referred to blacks as niggers and would hang them for anything and sometimes nothing. Crooks knew to stay out of the way and to be careful. He is called crooks because of his crooked back, he has this disability because he was kicked in the back by a horse. When Lennie walks into Crooks bunkhouse, he tries to get rid off him but when he cant he takes advantage of his slowness. He tries to speak to Lennie and treat him like the other white men treat Crooks. He to get Lennie to understand what life is like for him by saying suppose George didnt ever come back from town, because then he would be on his own like Crooks. But Lennie didnt her the suppose at the beginning of the sentence and got very angry towards Crooks and got very worried. Out of life Crooks wanted to be treated equally and be given the same rights, like when he used to play with the white children when he was a child before he knew it was wrong. He wanted to be a lawyer, it was his dream but he couldnt because he was black. He wanted to be able to live in normal accommodation like the other workers instead he lived in a small room the connected to the harness room next to a dung pile. In his room he had many possessions, he more than he would be able to carry, this shows he had good job security. Many of his possessions were books, he had lots because he had collected them but mainly because he is extremely clever and liked to read. Crooks is very lonely in the book, and it probably related to real life as well. He was very lonely because he had no friends because the whites werent allowed to speak to him a most of the blacks had move away from the southern states, and he also did not have any family in California. Overall I think Crooks character reflects life in 30s very well. Like in life he is separated from the whites and is given no respect and looked down upon. Curleys wife is also an icon for life in the 30s. She does not have a name and does not work. In the book she is put across as less important than the men, and a lot of time she is told what to do by the men. Her character is vain and also gets angry and defensive very quickly. She also is very sarcastic and doesnt seem to be very bright. She like crooks is separated, she is separated from other women and doesnt seem to be very bright. She like Crooks is separated, she is separated from other women. Not once in the book does she leave to see any friends or leave the ranch at all. Also like Crooks she cant fulfil her wishes or dreams. Crooks wants to be lawyer but cant, because hes black and Curleys wife wants to be able to go to Hollywood and be an actress. She has been denied the opportunity by being forced to stay on the ranch. There are so important because it gives them something to look forward to in life, it keeps them going. In the novel Curleys wife represents how women were not as important as men. She comes across as very silly, not very bright and the other men think that she could get someone in serious trouble. She has also not been given a name in the book, she is always referred to as Curleys wife, this is to show that she is insignificant and not as important as the men. She is the only women on the ranch and has no job, her only role is being a house wife. On the ranch all the men want to stay away from her because they think she will get them into trouble. Therefore She has nobody to talk to or tell about her dream to be a big time movie star. But when Lennie turns up she realises that he is to slow and nice not to listen or to walk away if she talked to him. So when she realises this she confides in him and tells everything she hasnt told any one else. Although she is very unhappy with Curley and says that he is bad man, she stays with him. This could because she knows one day he will get the ranch and have quite a lot of money compared to everyone else. She knows that if she sticks with him she will have a secure future. However one of the reasons why the men stay away from her is because she is a flirt and could get them into trouble. For example when Lennie and George first started working she came over to George and flirted with him. She would have to be careful because if she did get caught with another man she could be kicked out, and then would not have such a secure future. The men mainly see women as people they tell what to do and sleep with. They dont treat any women with respect except for Susi who runs the brothel in town, they tend to teat her with some respect as she shows them a good time, is nice and is honest. The men go town to go to the brothel to sleep with women at the end of each month when they get their pay. On page 55 they talk about Susis place saying things like Susis a laugh, Theres no water in her whisky implying that she is honest. They generally talk about what a nice place it is and how nice Susi is. From this you can tell that she is the only women they give any respect. Although Curley never really showed his wife any respect or showed he loved her. When Lennie killed her he goes cold and gets very mad and upset. He immediately gets his gun and organises two teams to find Lennie and shoot him. This shows that he did love her even though he didnt treat her very well. Another character is Slim, he tends to keep to himself and is very calm and quiet. Although he is quiet he has natural authority on the ranch, all the other men listen to him and take his advice. Even Curley listens and is scared of him, for example when Curley came into the bunkhouse looking for a fight Slim just stood up and Curley backed down. Also when Lennie Crushed Curleys hand Slim tells him to say that he hurt his hand in a machine. Curley is the boss son, he has a big ego and is very aggressive and quick tempered. He tries to pick fights with every one possibly because he wants control. The reason why he has a big ego and is quick to start a fight is because he is a good boxer, he even got a golden glove trophy for winning a tournament. Because his father had quite a lot of money compared to other people in the 1930s and the fact that he is white makes him feel superior and more important than any one else. The last character is Candy, the swamper. His job on the ranch is to go around and sweep up. The reason he does this job is because he is very old and has only got one hand, after losing his other in an accident with a machine. His best friend is his dog, which he has had all his life. However the other workers dont dog like the dog and say its no good for its self and smells. It would be better to put it down. Candy is also very keep to get in with George and Lennies dream as he is getting old and afraid the boss will just get rid of him when he is no good. Lennie and George among the other millions of people move around from job to job because when the job is done there is nothing else to do in this place. However Lennie and George tend to travel round more than others do because Lennie is always getting them in trouble. For example when they were in Weed digging the cesspit they had to leave in a hurry because Lennie had been accused of rape. Although what really happened was (from the book) Lennie saw a girl wearing pretty red dress which he liked the look of. And because he liked the look of it he grabbed it. the girl started to panic and ran out to a field where lots of men were walking screaming rape. George talking in the bunk house. Soon the men were chasing Lennie and George across fields and they ended up hiding in an irrigation ditch. None of the characters in the story talk much of their families except Lennie and George who briefly mention Lennies aunt Clara. I think this is significant because many of the mean had to leave their families to find work and if they do think of them they will begin to miss them which could effect their work, which could cause them to lose their job. The workers accommodation is very poor. All they have is a very small bed and a shelf. When George first went to his bed he found a bar of lice killer. All the workers get $50s a month, most of the men spend the majority of their money a the cat house in town where they pay for sex and alcohol. The boss looks down to the men as just workers, he doesnt interact with the men. The workers see the boss as very quick tempered but generally okay. On page 21 George asks Candy about the boss, he says what kind of a guy is the boss. Candy replies well, hes a pretty nice fellow. Gets pretty mad sometimes but nice. All the men dress in denim jeans and jacket. They wear these because they are very hard wearing and lasts along time. The way they dress reflects on how they are living. They are wearing tough clothes which relates to the fact they are sleeping rough and in they jobs they are having to do a lot of hard labour. Also they last for a long time because they dont have the money to buy more. Curley and his father have more than one set of clothes, and even suit but compared to every one else including Lennie and George this is a lot as they only have one set of clothes, all denim so they will last a long time. None of the men have many possessions, they only have what they can carry as they have no job security so if they get to much Stuff and get fired they would have to leave it behind. The only person who has a lot of possessions is Crooks, he has lots of books magazines and even a shotgun, this is because he is likely to keep his job because he is the best. None of the men have luxury items as none of them can afford any, this is because of the depression as there is no extra money. Lennie and George among all the men have a dream for better things. The dream is for them to own their own piece of land with their own animals to look after. To Lennie hearing the dream is like a small child hearing its favourite story. He knows how it goes but wants to hear it. Hes always asking George (like on page 16) to tell him the dream and how he is going to tend the rabbits. It seems that George doesnt really think the dream will happen, that its just something to keep them going but when Candy offers to put all his money into it he really begins to believe it can happen. But when Lennie goes into Crooks room and tells him the dream Crooks reaction is you nuts as he knows there is a very small chance of it happening. When Curleys wife enters she says I seen too many guys sayin they are gonna get their own piece of land and not one of em has. I think the story reflects life in the 30s brilliantly, all the characters show how life is, from Crooks showing how life was for blacks to Curleys wife showing how it was for women. In a way women are important in the story because they represent how they were treated as less important than men and there role in the 1930s. But in another way not thought as important characters in the novel because they are women and in this time the men didnt think they were as important as them. I think the story represents what life was really like for women in the 1930s correctly. In the story Crooks, Candy and his dog represent a world of intolerance quite well. In the book Crooks is a very useful person as he is very good at his job but is not tolerated by the other workers because he is black, compared to Candy who is old and not really any use to any one as all he can to is sweep the floor, but he is tolerated. This maybe because he is white, also because he is a human. When the other workers decide that Candys old dog is no good for its self, they take it out side and shoot it because it is only a dog. Candy says They wouldnt shoot me when Im no good, suggesting that white humans are tolerated more than dogs or black people. The workers respect each other and are polite to each other but at the same time its every man for him self as they cannot rely on anyone else to help them to much. The workers know its every man for himself as they no if they want anything such as to follow their dream they have to work for it themselves and not hope that other people will help them. Even though they know they are on their own all the workers are friends and watch out for each other on the ranch. Most of the men dont mind Lennie as they no he means well and is no trouble but Curley shows a more realistic view of him, which would better represent the 1930s better. Curley shows a lot of intolerance towards Lennie as he is seen as not normal, he shows this intolerance by continuously threatening him and in the end starting a fight with him. From looking over my work I believe the characters in the novel Of Mice And Men show that they were living in the 1930s very well. Their belongings jobs and actions all show that they were living in this period. I also believe the character of Crooks, Curleys wife and the boss all show how different people were treated at this time.

Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde Essa

â€Å"The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde† is a gothic horror novella written by Robert Louis Stevenson in the Victorian era. The novella follows a well-respected doctor - Henry Jekyll - and his struggle between good and evil when he takes a potion and becomes Mr Hyde. Robert Louis Stevenson - the author of the novella â€Å"The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde†- was born in Edinburgh in 1850 and died at the young age of forty-four. He wrote the book in 1886. As a child he was very close to his nurse and when he was ill she used to read him Bible stories as he was brought up in a strict Catholic tradition, which he later rebelled against. This led to his fascination for his city’s low life and for bizarre characters, which proved rich material for later stories. Deacon Brodie lived in Edinburgh in the eighteenth century. His double life is thought to have been the inspiration for Robert Louis Stevenson to write â€Å"Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde†. Deacon Brodie lived an extravagant lifestyle, which even his high position in Edinburgh society could not support, so he turned to crime to finance his lifestyle. This concept of a doppelganger - a shadow of a different side of a human - was used in â€Å"Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde† to create the same effect. Stevenson may also have found inspiration from a book, called â€Å"Frankenstein† by Mary Shelley as it is of the gothic horror genre just like Stevenson’s book. A gothic horror story contains a plot hinged on suspense and mystery, which often involves the supernatural. Another writer, who may have influenced Stevenson’s writing, is Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. Within Stevenson’s gothic horror story - â€Å"Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde† - suspense is added by the descrip... ...nerable. He portrays evil to be strong, as you only think of yourself and what you want, and this is why Hyde attempts to take over Jekyll. Although Hyde seems to take over Jekyll there is still a part of Jekyll there, which makes Hyde take the potion to become Jekyll again, so that he can then end the evil of the beast he created which also means ending his life too. In conclusion I feel Stevenson has successfully portrayed evil through his characters, setting and language. I enjoyed the different ways it suggests evil and I believe Robert Louis Stevenson has accomplished his aim to write a gothic horror book and â€Å"The Strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is truly a book of its time as creating an evil side that, if made subject to, would alter normal civilized behaviour and conduct horrific violence was unheard of at the time the book was published.

Should Adopted Kids Have the Right to Know Who Their Biological Parents Are

Should Adopted Kids Know Who Their Biological Parents Are? Whether adoptive children should know who their birth parents is something that is questioned too much. Children should have the right to be able to know who their birth parents are if they choose to do so. If children do not want to know who their birth parents are then they probably have a reason behind it. Children who do not know who their birth parents are, should find out who they are so that they can have contact with them.Some children are absolutely accurate that they do not want to know about who their birth parents are, but on the other hand some children do want to figure out who their birth parents are. All children that are adopted should have the right to find out who their biological parents are. There are so many reasons why a child should find out who their biological parents are so that they know what they are going to face later on in life. For a children to know who their biological parents are can be hel pful for both the child and their biological parents.If the child is to grow up and have a disease then the child should know what kind of disease that they are going to face throughout their life. It is important the the child should know about the medical and even the genetic history of their family. If the child was to not know what kind of medical problems they have, then they would not have an idea about what they have. This is important for the child to know so that way they can know what they are up against. Medical problems are an important factor for the child to know about so that they do not end up being sick or even worse end up in the hospital.The children not knowing what kind of medical condition they have can lead to complications. The child can be affected greatly from this because it could cause them to not be able to do the things that they did before. There is times when it does not affect them too bad, but at times it can cause something serious. There is so man y reasons why a child should not find out who their biological parents are, like for instance the parents could be harmful. If the child was being abused then the parents should not have the right to see the child. When the child obtains this information then they might think that there should be revenge.This could be avoided if the adoptive parents do not allow the child to have contact with the child. Therefore the whereabouts and their information should be kept away from the biological parents, but kept secretly by the adoptive parents. When the child wants to find their biological parents it can sometimes make them feel betrayed. Like for instance the care of the child by the adoptive parents could have involved money, social matters, and even time for the child. The foster parents have as much right as the biological parents to be parents of the adoptive child.This can occur for the matter of fact that adoption involves the transfer of rights from the foster parents to the bio logical parents. The transfer is not like a contract because it does not end when the child becomes grown up, but goes throughout their entire life Child adoption can be controversial because it requires time to handle and address things in order to take care of effective questions that may come up. Adoption is the practice where rights from the biological parents of their child are transferred permanently to the adoptive parents, which are known also as the foster parents.In some countries adoption undergoes many precautions so that they can ensure that the adoptive parents have a reason for why they want to adopt a child. Adoption is different because the biological parents do not interfere with the child as they grow up. In the Unites States it is said that about one hundred and twenty thousand cases of child adoption occur each year. Adoption has committed to many different reasons form whether the biological parents cannot care for the child to where they can not provide certai n needs for the child.Since adoption includes the transfer of rights from biological parents to the foster parents the child does not know if they are adopted or not. This is unless that the adoptive parents make the decision to decide whether to tell the child that they are adopted. The issues of adoption can be very tender and can cause torture to the child if the information is given to them at a later age. To help take care of this situation the information is hidden from the child until they are old enough to make their own decisions. However many children have the desire to know why they were adopted and who their biological parents are.For the child to be willing to find out who their biological parents are is something that a lot of people question. On the other hand it is the right of the child to search for their biological parents if they have the desire to. When they are grown up then they have the right to make their own decision about what they want to do. No one shoul d have the right to tell someone not to do something that they want to do. All children should have the right to choose whether they want to find out who their biological parents are without the saying of other people.

An Author’s Life Is Reflected in Their Works

I strongly believe that an author’s life is reflected in their works. Well-known authors all over the world claim that important events in their lives are mentioned in the books they write. Tessa Duder said that her sailing experience inspired her to write about some children sailing together in her short story Too Close to the Wind, Patricia Grace wrote Beans based on the sports she played with her relatives when she was little, and The Lumber Room reflected the revenge Saki used to play on his aunts. Tessa Duder, Patricia Grace, and Saki are examples of authors whose lives are reflected in their works. Let’s take Saki, for example. His mother died when he was very little. Saki was looked after by his grandmother and two strict aunts Charlotte and Augusta throughout his childhood. Living with them was a nightmare for Saki, as he often took revenge on them when he was little, just like Nicholas in The Lumber Room and Conradin in Sredni Vashtar. Saki also cared for wild animals. His love for animals was shown in his famous short stories, The Lumber Room, Sredni Vashtar, The Open Window and Tobermory. Saki loathed people in mid-upper class in Britain in the 1900s. He thinks that all they care about are themselves. He didn’t write about them with kindness in The Easter Egg, and used a talking cat to embarrass them at a tea party in Tobermory. Saki’s health was very fragile when he was little. The doctor said neither him nor his siblings would survive into adulthood. His delicate health was reflected by the main characters in Sredni Vashtar and The Easter Egg. From all those examples, it is clear that Saki’s life is reflected in his works. Patricia Grace is another author who writes about her life in her works. Her writing career started when she was 25 years old with children. She has a large family and she displayed her love for her relatives in Butterflies, It used to be Green Once, The Trolley and A Way of Talking. Patricia also honoured her Maori culture by using Maori words in three of her short stories that I’ve read. A Way of Talking is a clear example of Patricia’s feelings about racism in everyday life. In the story, Jane was making disparaging comments about Maori people in front of Rose, the same thing that happened when Patricia Grace was at primary school because she was the only Maori girl there. Fun times in Patricia’s life were also shown between the lines of her writing. Meeting up with her cousins in the weekends, playing sports and doing physical things were mentioned in The Trolley; It used to be Green Once and especially in Beans. The events that took part in Patricia Grace’s stories are based on events that happened in her life. Most of Tessa Duder’s characters are created based on her personality. When Christchurch Children’s Library interviewed her, Tessa said that she was good at sports and literacy when she was young, just like Moana in Moana’s Secret, Cindy in Cindy Becomes a Star and Michael in The Violin. Her personal tragedy was reflected in the Alex quartet. Both Tessa and the main character, Alex lost someone they love; which in Tessa’s case is her daughter Clare, and in Alex’s case her boyfriend Andy. Activities Tessa did when she was little were also reflected in her stories. When she was five years old she sailed on a sailboat from New Zealand to England with her family. Sailboats were mentioned in her novella Too Close to the Wind and her short story, Person Overboard. Without knowing what sailing is and how to sail, it is not possible for Tessa Duder to write about sailing in her stories. As a swimmer who trained for six years in her teenage life and the first New Zealand woman to train seriously in the Dolphin-Butterfly stroke first introduced in the 1956 Olympics, Tessa Duder wrote about swimming in three of her short stories and the Alex quartet is about a girl who trained very hard in order to take part in the Olympic Games in Rome. Tessa Duder’s life is clearly reflected in her works from the examples shown. An author’s life is reflected in their works. This statement is clearly proven with the British author who wrote 100 years ago and two New Zealand authors who still spend their time working on new book drafts. The storyline, the personality of the characters and the twist in the stories are often related to the events that happened in the author’s life. Through the eyes of a reader, I believe that their love for writing inspires authors to write. An author’s life is reflected in their works.

The Movie Proof Essays

The Movie Proof Essays The Movie Proof Essay The Movie Proof Essay Proof Proof is a film by John Madden. This movie is based on a play written by David Aubum which was a Pulitzer Prize winning play. This was originally produced by the Manhattan Theatre Club on May 23, 2000. It was made into a movie in 2005. Proof was acted out as in today’s times, not a replica that would have taken place decades ago. The main cast members were Gwyneth Paltrow as Catherine, Anthony Hopkins as Catherine’s father and Jake Gyllenhaal as Hal. This film is about a professor that was a mathematician. Anthony Hopkins played this specific role. The beginning started out as if he had been sick and shortly into the movie he passed away. Flashbacks that were not distinctly identified by some sort of change in scenery or computer editing, told the story of his profession and the brilliant mind of his character. Catherine dedicated the past 5 years to taking care of him throughout his illness until his passing. Catherine got to where she did not care as much about her appearance and schooling because of her devotion of love and care to her father. Hal was a student of her fathers who was a graduate also in mathematics. Hal knew of Catherine’s father’s proofs of math problems he came up with that proved to be correct, and wanted to find, out of his 130 notebooks, if his last one was correct. If it was, Hal wanted to have it published and made public. His personality was portrayed as a down to earth type of person who had a lot of care for Catherine. Catherine’s sister Clair (Hope Davis) comes into town for the funeral. She had a bold, persistent personality. She would not give up on anything until it was going to go the way she wanted. As the story goes ~ Catherine and her father lived together in Chicago. She took care of her ill father for many years until his death. Everyone that knew of him knew he was a genius in math, even coming up with formulas that no other could do. During his battle and staying at home, he would still practice problems and try to come up with something else. Catherine started buying him blank notebooks that ended with 130 by the time of his passing. When Clair arrives in town for their father’s funeral she visually realizes the mental status of her sister and how she had a large amount of grief that she carried around with her. Hal became a friend to Catherine as he would come over to finish homework. He knew of the notebooks and having an idea of what they contained but had to convince Catherine into letting him look at them. Very upset and stressed about her father’s death, she finally gives into Hal. Meanwhile, Clair planned the funeral with only how she though it should go. Having her persistent personality, she was insisting that Catherine come live with her and her husband in New York. Hal went around to different professors trying to see if the proof in the notebook he had worked out correctly and to get Catherine to publish it. Catherine admits that it was actually her notebook and work, but being in the mental state she was in, Hal nor her sister believed her. They had no knowledge of how brilliant her mind is, just as that as her father’s. Emotions come out when she is not believed. Her handwriting was nearly the same as her fathers. To make matters worse, Clair informed Catherine that she sold the house without her knowing and pushes for her to move to New York. Very opposed at first, she gives in and the house is packed and as they are leaving for the airport, Hal shows up to admit that it possibly is her writing, being very apologetic. She does not accept his words and leaves with Clair to head to the airport. Upon waiting to board their plane, she realizes he was serious about his words and believing her, runs out of the airport and back to Hal. The ending leaves you in suspense as to if the notebook containing the proof was 100% correct and if it was, did it get published. I was left with a kind of mixed impression of the film. Although it was a great movie, it was also one that I would watch one time unlike the ones we all can watch over and over ex: Wizard of Oz. There were several times I didn’t realize it went back into the past. There was no change of scenery, costumes not lighting to give you that hint. The costumes were that of normal, everyday, up to date clothing. This production went along throughout the whole thing with the characters keeping their personalities the same as from at the first and kept up with the dialogue point very well. Many aspects were visible to show the movies performance. All of the actors represented their own separate conflicts that didn’t affect the others. Catherine was stuck in grief and sadness until the end. She had the role as one facing depression. Clair was a person of confidence and pride. She presented an image of making one think she could do anything and everyone would let things go her way. Hal was a man of honor and appreciation. He knew how intelligent her father was and showed in a nonvisible was that he was honored to have been one of his students. Proof seemed to me as an example of a classical drama. A death was presented at the beginning only didn’t show the battle he fought. Catherine had a lot of mixed emotions that made her personality such as sadness, denial and guilt. Problems and emotions tent to get worse until the end when someone realizes the possibility of truth. This was made more for a movie and had no clues that it had once been a play. In summary, Proof was worth watching leaving me to think about what the point may be. I interpret it as relaying to an audience that our minds will only hold knowledge based on where we set our expectations. Setting high expectations means we know we will not always get it right on the first try but won’t stop until we reach our own level of satisfaction.

Antigone Essay Example for Free (#3)

Antigone Essay Essay Topic: Oedipus Choose cite format: APA MLA Harvard Chicago ASA IEEE AMA company About StudyMoose Contact Careers Help Center Donate a Paper Legal Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy Complaints Evil not only fascinates people in general, but writers as well. In what ways and with what effect has â€Å"evil† been treated in Antigone? In the play of ‘Antigone’, evil appears in many forms. There is the soldier who is a traitor to his nation; the sister trying to prove her love for her family yet ends up breaking the law; the king who so eagerly tries to stop rule-breakers yet he himself neglects his flesh and blood. Here the difference of the two works is seen: The Earth of Mankind gives the impression that characters of power possess evil, whereas in Antigone, evil can be inside all of these opposing individuals. Polyneices, a soldier who fought against his own nation was to be punished as a traitor by not burying him after his death. When his sister, Antigone, goes against the King’s decree and burry Polyneices, she was also seen as a traitor to her country. However their other sibling, Ismene, who sits at home as Antigone fights for her brother’s right, is also said to have performed a crime of being a traitor to her family. Now something we can see from here is that each and every character involved in the story so far possesses evil. This message is summed up by Sophocles in page 204 of the book, in Ode 1, where it says, ‘O fate of man, working both good and evil! ’ What the writer is trying to convey here is more realistic than what is said in ‘The Earth of Mankind’; both evil and good is naturally inside everyone’s mind. It is one’s choice to do which, but performing a crime is inevitable. Everyone has his or her own ‘evil’ deeds, not only the powerful ones. As seen in my previous explanation on who performs evil deeds in the play of ‘Antigone’, we can see that one evil act leads to another, whereas the chain of good doings ends sooner. Eteocles, who was a soldier and a brother to Antigone, fought bravely for his nation and was buried with honor by the King. Although many respect him for his virtuosity, the play didn’t show that further kindness was done because of him. However, when Polyneices betrays his nation and fought against it, a number of people are forced to perform evil in his affect. Antigone had to break the law in order to give him his right of getting a burial. Ismene, who was too scared to go against the decree, was said to be a traitor to her family, as she didn’t come to assist Antigone in her mission. They then cause Creon to imprison the sisters, punish them, which then cause him to have a fight with his son. Creon then causes death of Haimon, and therefore leads to the suicide of the Queen. On page 243, the messenger says, ‘†¦and her last breath was a curse for their father, the murderer of her sons. ’ A number of misfortunes occur as being the result of one act of evil. The play now gives the effect that evil gives more negative outcomes in comparison to good giving positive results. Here, evil is powerful enough to make such a big impact on its surrounding; bigger than the good. Creon sees Antigone as a traitor to his rules, despite her reasons. Creon imprisoned both Antigone and Ismene for the burial of the nation’s traitor, Polyneices, who is their brother. It is true that Antigone has broken the law, but according to her logic, it is more important to follow the rules of the Gods than the King. She feels that the dead, no matter what they did in their lives, deserve respect and be buried, and that it was her duty to do so as Polyneices’ sister. She didn’t care that she is breaking the decree, and may be punished to die, as long as this task is done. Creon, being a non-believer of the Gods in the beginning, thinks that breaking the law is crime, no matter for what purpose. Polyneices was a traitor and he suffers because of himself, thus no one should help him. On page 211, Creon even said to Antigone, ‘An enemy is an enemy, even dead. ’ There is truth in both arguments, and no one can say what is right. Here, the play depicts that the existence of evil depends on how one views it. ‘Antigone’ treats evil as a subjective topic, where it may be seen as a crime from one point of view, but is actually a good deed from another. No evil deed is done without a reason, and the play shows that one should explore, not only what crime has been done, but also why it was done. Antigone. (2018, Nov 02).

COMPARATIVE POLITICS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

COMPARATIVE POLITICS - Essay Example Thus, for example participation and activities in sports or female organizations should be also considered as political participation. This idea can be supported by the fact that all kinds of political and social organizations function in a political context of the country (Clark and Vincent Hoffmann-Martinot, 1998); they have administrative regulation and active social activities performed by their participants. Therefore political culture is a wide concept. In order to consider it with regard to political participation, we’ll focus our attention on political processes in three case study countries: USA, Russia and France. The main claim which will be developed in this research paper is that political events, socio-economic changes in these countries determine a context of political culture. A diverse political culture of the chosen countries, historical background and peculiarities of countries’ development is considered as influential factors of both political cultur e and political participation in America, Russia and France. America America is generally considered to be the most democratic country. Two hundred years were devoted to the development of democratic process in this country. America is well-known for overall obliged democratic principles and in spite of numerous arguments, this country will hardly loose heights of its democratic principles. ... Consequently, the most important values for Americans are: Declaration of Independence which propagates liberty and overall happiness, equality, self-government (i.e. â€Å"of the people, by the people, and for the people†) (Dye, 1994); propagation of individualistic success and respect to diversity. American nation is being developed in compliance with democratic principles, constitutionalism and capitalism. Consequently, there is direct delimitation between political, economic and social issues in America. This country propagates equal participation on different levels of country’s life. It can be supported by the fact that Americans actively participate in the voting process, they are active participants of social organizations and there is a high spirit of voluntarism in America. All these facts prove that political participation of American citizens coincides with propagated principles of liberty, independence, democracy, and respect to diversity. All this happens because of rich historical background of America: an intermixture of different cultures made Americans comply with different traditions, customs and respect different nations. Democratic principles are another ideal which America has been developing from the day of its foundation. Therefore, American nation respects and follows national politics, being an active participant in all spheres of country’s life. Therefore political culture of this country creates a favorable atmosphere for individual’s perfection and development (Kaid, Gerstlae and Sanders, 1991). A voluntary striving of the nation to the welfare of America proves the fact that citizens of the country respect America and work for the favor of their native country (Kernen, Beat, 2004). Russia Russia has been developed under